The Math of Decay: How Depreciation Steals the Future
The Lie on the Table: Immediate Loss
I took a bite of the bread 4 seconds ago and realized too late that the underside was a map of blue-green rot. It is that specific flavor-damp basement and betrayal-that fills my mouth as I look at the line item for my server room.
Depreciation is the most boring word in the English language, and that is why it is so dangerous. It sounds like a natural law, like gravity or the slow cooling of the sun. We are told that things wear out. Your roof gets older by 14% every year; your laptop loses 34% of its soul the moment you crack the seal on the box. But in the hands of an insurance carrier, depreciation isn’t a calculation. It is a subjective weapon. They aren’t measuring the wear on your floorboards; they are measuring how much of your claim they can legally delete.
Value in the Literal Sense of Decay
I spend most of my days as a hospice musician. I sit in rooms where things are actually depreciating in the literal sense-human bodies, memories, the very air in the lungs of people who have maybe 24 or 34 days left.
“
A piano that hasn’t been tuned in 44 years is priceless because it was the one someone’s mother played. But to the insurer, that piano is a ‘non-functional asset with 94% life-cycle depletion.’ They see a pile of dead wood where I see the resonance of a life.
– The Contrast of Valuation
It is a cold way to view the world, and yet, I find myself doing it too. I looked at that moldy bread and didn’t think about the effort of the baker; I thought about the 14 cents I wasted on that slice. We are all infected by this math of loss.
The insurer is not your accountant; they are an author writing a tragedy where you lose everything in the final act.
The Water Came Through 14 Weeks Ago
When the Adjuster Clicks His Pen
When the water came through the ceiling 14 weeks ago, it didn’t just ruin the servers. It ruined the 24 months of work stored within them. But the adjuster doesn’t care about work. He cares about ‘useful life.’ He told me the servers were 4 years old, which in ‘tech time’ apparently means they are basically stone tablets.
The Payout Offered
VS
The True Cost
This is where the ‘Actual Cash Value’ (ACV) trap snaps shut. … If you don’t have the $110,004 difference sitting in your bank account-which, let’s be honest, most people don’t after a disaster-you are stuck. You can’t rebuild, so you never get the withheld money, and the insurance company keeps it. It is a circular logic designed to bankrupt the vulnerable.
The Impossibility of Half a Roof
I’ve seen this happen with roofs more than anything else. A roof is designed to last 34 years. A storm hits in year 14. The insurance company says, ‘Well, you used up nearly half the roof, so we’re only paying half.’
Roof Life Cycle (34 Years)
Used 41%
But you can’t tell the rain to only fall on the 54% of the house that you’ve been paid for.
Depreciation is a ghost that haunts your policy, waiting for a fire to become visible.
Elias’s Clocks and Permanent Resonance
I remember a patient, a man named Elias who had 44 vintage clocks in his house. None of them worked. He liked the silence. If his house burned down, the insurance company would argue those clocks were worth the price of scrap metal because they didn’t fulfill their ‘useful function.’
The Search (Value)
The Curation (Meaning)
The Stillness (Presence)
This is the fundamental disconnect. We live in a world of meaning; insurers live in a world of ‘indemnity,’ a word that basically means ‘making you whole,’ though their definition of ‘whole’ usually looks like a person missing 64% of their limbs.
It’s a mistake to think you have to accept their tables. These ‘useful life’ charts aren’t handed down on stone tablets. They are negotiable. This is why people bring in experts like National Public Adjusting to look at the math from a human perspective. Because if a server room was maintained in a climate-controlled environment at 64 degrees for 4 years, it hasn’t depreciated at the same rate as one sitting in a dusty garage. The condition matters. The maintenance matters. Your reality matters more than their spreadsheet.
I’m thinking about how the wood in my cello is over 104 years old. Technically, by insurance standards, it should have been ‘depreciated’ into negative existence a century ago. Yet, the older it gets, the better it sounds. Why is there no ‘appreciation clause’ for the things we care for?
Fighting the Calendar’s Tyranny
The technical precision they use to devalue our lives is staggering. They will cite a 4% wear-and-tear factor on a ceramic tile that hasn’t been stepped on in 14 years because it was under a rug. They want to pay you for the ghost of your property, not the reality of it.
When the adjuster shows up with his 14-page document and his 4-color graphs, you have to remember that his job is to minimize the liability of a corporation, not to restore your life. I once spent 44 minutes playing a Bach suite for a woman who couldn’t speak… That twitch was worth more than every ‘useful life’ table in the history of the insurance industry. It was a reminder that value is not a function of time; it is a function of presence.
To fight back against improper depreciation, you have to be obsessive. You have to show them the maintenance records from 24 months ago. You have to point out that the ‘market value’ they are using is based on a 4-state average that doesn’t reflect the 14% increase in local costs. If you don’t, they will take that $110,004 and put it into their own ‘useful life’-which usually involves a 4-star resort for their shareholders.
Some Things Get Deeper
I finally threw the bread away. The mold was too deep. Sometimes, things are truly gone. But my server room isn’t moldy bread. It was the backbone of my livelihood. And the fact that an insurance company thinks they can pay me 24 cents on the dollar because of a calendar is a form of institutional theft that we’ve all just decided to call ‘business.’
Stop Being Polite About Theft
We need to stop being so polite about it. We need to stop looking at these settlement checks as gifts and start looking at them as what they are: a breach of contract disguised as math.
I’m going to go play my 104-year-old cello now. I’m going to play it loud enough to shake the dust off the 44-page claim sitting on my table. I’m going to remind myself that some things don’t depreciate. Some things just get deeper.
If you find yourself staring at a number that doesn’t feel like enough, remember that you aren’t just fighting for money. You are fighting for the right to define the value of your own life. Don’t let them tell you that your world is 74% gone just because the sun went around a star 4 times. You are still here. Your loss is 104% real. And the math should reflect that. Is it ever really fair to judge a life by its end, or a roof by its age, or a song by the silence that follows it?